Named Allele Matcher 101

The Named Allele Matcher is responsible for calling diplotypes from variant call data. While it is designed to be used in the PharmCAT pipeline, it can also be run independently.

The basic process:

  1. Read in all named allele definitions from the gene definition table. Each gene has a reference allele defined by the first definition row in the table (e.g. *1). By default, any non-reference named allele that does not contain a base call for a given position (i.e. blank spots in the definition table) will default to the reference row's base call.
  2. Read in sample data (VCF file), ignoring positions that are not used in the gene definition tables.
  3. For each gene:
    • If the data is phased:
      1. Attempt to match the genotypes in each strand to a named allele.
      2. Return matched diplotype
    • If the data is unphased:
      1. Generate all possible combinations of genotypes for the positions of interest.
      2. Attempt to match each combination to a named allele.1
      3. If there are matches, try to build diplotypes by making sure that the genotype combinations are possible.
      4. Return matched diplotype(s). If multiple diplotypes are possible, they are scored and only the top-scoring diplotype(s) is returned.2

Note that some genes have to be handled differently (e.g. DPYD and SLCO1B1). See Gene Definition Exceptions for details.

When given unphased data, the Named Allele Matcher may call multiple diplotypes. These are all equally possible and valid in the absence of additional information. They are assigned scores not because one is better than another, but so that we can consistently pick one over another when necessary since we are only reporting those with the highest score by default.2 It is as arbitrary as sorting them alphabetically and defaulting to the first one.

For reliable diplotype calls, phased data is best.

Scoring

Each named allele is given a score based on the number of variant positions used to define the allele (non-blank cells in that row). This means that the reference allele will always have the maximum score because all positions are defined for that allele.

Take a look at this sample gene definition table:

  rs1 rs2 rs3 rs4 rs5 score
*1 C C T G A 5
*2 T T   A   3

Since the gene definition table contains 5 positions, the reference allele, *1, gets a score of 5 while *2 only has 3 positions defined and gets a score of 3. 3

A diplotype's score is the combined score of its component named alleles. A *1/*2 from the example above would have a score of 8.

Missing Positions

If the sample data has missing positions that are required by a named allele definition, the position will be dropped from consideration.

This is the only reason the score for a diplotype might be different between two samples.

Examples

Using the following gene definition table:

  rs1 rs2 rs3 rs4 rs5 score
*1 C C T G A 5
*2 T     A   2
*3       A   1
*4   T       1
*5 T         1

And the following (unphased) sample data:

rs1 rs2 rs3 rs4 rs5
C/T C/C T/T A/G A/A

The potential permutations of those genotypes will match *1, *2, *3 and *5.

From that, plausible diplotypes are:

Diplotype Score
*1/*2 5 + 2 = 7
*3/*5 1 + 1 = 2

Which results in *1/*2 being returned.

Note that *1/*3 is not a plausible diplotype because one chromosome must have a C and the other must have a T at position rs1. They can't both be C. Similarly, *2/*3 is not a plausible diplotype either because it cannot be homozygous at rs4.

Missing rs5

If we use the same gene definition table as the example above and the following (unphased) sample data, with no data available for rs5:

rs1 rs2 rs3 rs4 rs5
C/T C/C T/T A/G  

The results would be the same, except the scores would be different:

Diplotype Score
*1/*2 4 + 2 = 6
*3/*5 1 + 1 = 2

Missing rs1

If we use the same gene definition table as the example above and the following (unphased) sample data, with no data available for rs1:

rs1 rs2 rs3 rs4 rs5
  C/C T/T A/G A/A

Then the results would be different:

Diplotype Score
*1/*2 4 + 1 = 5
*1/*3 4 + 1 = 5

As such, *1/*2 and *1/*3 would be returned.

Note that *5 could never be matched in this scenario because its defining allele is missing.

Undocumented Variations

By default, only genetic variations that are defined in the allele definitions can be mapped to genotypes by the Named Allele Matcher. If the sample includes a variant call that is located at an allele-defining position but itself not included in the allele definitions, the Named Allele Matcher produces a "Not called" for the affected gene since the sample matches neither the reference nor any defined variant.

A "Not called" output cannot be connected to guideline recommendations, even if the sample has other defined, actionable variants. The decision was made that, in the interest of providing recommendation guidance, these undocumented variants are set to reference for genes for which the defined variants affect drug toxicity. This applies to:

  • CACNA1S
  • DPYD
  • G6PD
  • NUDT15
  • RYR1
  • TPMT

Combinations and Partial Alleles

Calling combinations and partial alleles is intended for research use only.

A combination allele is when a sample matches a combination of 2 or more defined alleles. For example, [*6 + *14] in the CYP2B6 [*6 + *14]/*13 diplotype output.

PharmCAT's syntax for combination calls uses square brackets to reflect that it is a variation on one gene copy and to distinguish it from gene duplications (e.g. tandem arrangements like CYP2D6 *36+*10).

A partial allele is when a sample matches all the (core) variants of a defined allele but also has additional variants. For example, CYP2C19 *2/[*17 + g.94781859G>A]. In the case where a partial call occurs off the reference allele, only the positions are listed (e.g. *2/g.94781859G>A).

When asked to find combinations and partial alleles, the Named Allele Matcher will only attempt to do so if no viable call can be made.

The Named Allele Matcher will only look for variant combinations not catalogued by PharmVar or other nomenclature sites. It does not consider novel variants; it only considers variants included in existing allele definitions found in novel combinations.

Phased vs. Unphased Data

When dealing with unphased data, note that the Named Allele Matcher will never produce a combination/partial allele call if there is a viable non-combination/partial call. For example, if the sample would be called CYP2B6 *1/[*8 + *9] with phased data, the Named Allele Matcher will only call *8/*9 if the data is unphased because that is a viable call. It will not attempt to look for potential combination/partial alleles.

In addition, to limit the potential search space, a partial off the reference allele will only be called if the data is phased or the unphased data only has 2 possible sequence combinations.

Scoring

Because PharmCAT scores on the number of matched positions in the definitions, the reference named allele (usually *1) will get the highest score. As such, scoring is biased towards grouping combinations together. For example, CYP2B6 *1/[*5 + *9 + *23] will be the call with the highest score but permutations such as *5/[*9 + *23], *9/[*5 + *23], *23/[*5 + *9] are also possible.

Notes

1: If sample data is not phased and we do not assume the reference for missing positions in the definition, it is possible to have multiple matches for a single named allele.

2: This behavior can be modified to return all potential diplotype matches.

3: This score is the same regardless of whether we assume the reference for missing positions.


PharmCAT is managed at Stanford University & University of Pennsylvania (NHGRI U24HG013077).